<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Michael Shanks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mshanks.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mshanks.com</link>
	<description>all things archaeological</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:56:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on the archaeological uncanny by Didiot Lavine</title>
		<link>http://www.mshanks.com/2012/12/14/the-archaeological-uncanny/#comment-6118</link>
		<dc:creator>Didiot Lavine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mshanks.com/?p=4836#comment-6118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for this enlightening article. I&#039;m currently trying to bolster an argument that in searching for personal, cultural or national identity through ancestry and history, one is constantly moving further into the past (the unfamiliar) in order to understand the present (the familiar). And that this creates an ambiguity, an uncanny confusion in reconciling the past and present, as the &#039;homely&#039;, the current cultural state, is forgotten or ignored in the very process of seeking for it. I think this is given greater significance when one considers that notions of ancestry and the formation of elaborate burial rites were key distinctions between early homo sapiens and their neanderthal and homo erectus contemporaries. Tedious waffle over, I&#039;d be really interested to hear your opinion or any advice on articles etc. you think may be of note.
All the best]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this enlightening article. I&#8217;m currently trying to bolster an argument that in searching for personal, cultural or national identity through ancestry and history, one is constantly moving further into the past (the unfamiliar) in order to understand the present (the familiar). And that this creates an ambiguity, an uncanny confusion in reconciling the past and present, as the &#8216;homely&#8217;, the current cultural state, is forgotten or ignored in the very process of seeking for it. I think this is given greater significance when one considers that notions of ancestry and the formation of elaborate burial rites were key distinctions between early homo sapiens and their neanderthal and homo erectus contemporaries. Tedious waffle over, I&#8217;d be really interested to hear your opinion or any advice on articles etc. you think may be of note.<br />
All the best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on in memoriam by Romana Golicz</title>
		<link>http://www.mshanks.com/2012/08/01/in-memoriam/#comment-5662</link>
		<dc:creator>Romana Golicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mshanks.com/?p=4170#comment-5662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How truly sad and shocking for me. Having been away working for a year in a remote part of England, I found out only now about Rathje&#039;s passing, ten months on. I came late to archaeology, but recently gained a First at Leicester with a Dissertation inspired entirely by Rathje&#039;s work in Garbology. I have no &#039;heroes&#039; in my discipline, and I am never star-struck, but Rathje was the only archaeologist/anthropologist I ever wanted to meet, and to him more than anyone else I owe my boundless and fluid archaeological perspective. Thank you William, and God Bless You.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How truly sad and shocking for me. Having been away working for a year in a remote part of England, I found out only now about Rathje&#8217;s passing, ten months on. I came late to archaeology, but recently gained a First at Leicester with a Dissertation inspired entirely by Rathje&#8217;s work in Garbology. I have no &#8216;heroes&#8217; in my discipline, and I am never star-struck, but Rathje was the only archaeologist/anthropologist I ever wanted to meet, and to him more than anyone else I owe my boundless and fluid archaeological perspective. Thank you William, and God Bless You.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bill Rathje by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mshanks.com/2012/05/30/bill-rathje/#comment-5180</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 01:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mshanks.com/?p=4106#comment-5180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mshanks.com/2012/08/01/in-memoriam/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; my later posting&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See now <a href="http://www.mshanks.com/2012/08/01/in-memoriam/" rel="nofollow"> my later posting</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bill Rathje by Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.mshanks.com/2012/05/30/bill-rathje/#comment-5179</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 01:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mshanks.com/?p=4106#comment-5179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, I just heard this news.  I used to own a small business and Bill would come in everyday, have a snack, and watch people outside.  I never knew what he did (always thought he was a fisherman because of the vest) until an employee of mine said he was taking a college course and the book they were using was written by Bill.  I asked him about it and he said jokingly, &quot;Oh yes, I&#039;m very big in the world of garbage.&quot;  

He once left a notepad in my store and the next day, when I saw him and returned it, he was so wide eyes and grateful.  He offered me a reward, but when I declined, he thanked me profusely and left.  From then on, Bill would come in almost every day.  He was a big tipper and when we were busy, he&#039;d open and close the door instead of putting his order in.  Sometimes he would spend 30 minutes opening and closing the door for customers and saying hello to them.

Bill was a big guy, but moved very gently and spoke as if he were whispering.  I only looked him up because I promised him years ago that I would read something he wrote and for some reason, he sprang up in my mind.  Very sad news indeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I just heard this news.  I used to own a small business and Bill would come in everyday, have a snack, and watch people outside.  I never knew what he did (always thought he was a fisherman because of the vest) until an employee of mine said he was taking a college course and the book they were using was written by Bill.  I asked him about it and he said jokingly, &#8220;Oh yes, I&#8217;m very big in the world of garbage.&#8221;  </p>
<p>He once left a notepad in my store and the next day, when I saw him and returned it, he was so wide eyes and grateful.  He offered me a reward, but when I declined, he thanked me profusely and left.  From then on, Bill would come in almost every day.  He was a big tipper and when we were busy, he&#8217;d open and close the door instead of putting his order in.  Sometimes he would spend 30 minutes opening and closing the door for customers and saying hello to them.</p>
<p>Bill was a big guy, but moved very gently and spoke as if he were whispering.  I only looked him up because I promised him years ago that I would read something he wrote and for some reason, he sprang up in my mind.  Very sad news indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Richard III found? &#8211; why it matters by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mshanks.com/2013/02/04/richard-iii-found-why-it-matters/#comment-5178</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mshanks.com/?p=4955#comment-5178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s why it matters - 2

Let&#039;s not underestimate the scope of the &quot;haunting&quot; past!

Channel 4 in the UK got it right last night in their documentary called &quot;The King in the Car Park&quot; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.channel4.com/programmes/richard-iii-the-king-in-the-car-park/4od&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;[Link]&lt;/a&gt;

Setting - a car park that used to be Greyfriars Church in Leicester UK.

Presenter - mop haired Simon Farnaby - “comedian actor” as he described himself, and best known, if at all, from &lt;em&gt;The Mighty Boosh&lt;/em&gt; and the TV version of &lt;em&gt;Horrible Histories&lt;/em&gt;. Comment on the body, its bent spine and bashed in head - &quot;If that isn’t Richard III, that is one unlucky monk.”

The star was not an academic or historian, archaeologist or Church official, but Philippa Langley of the &lt;em&gt;Richard III Society&lt;/em&gt; - devoted, quite literally, to putting the record straight about her hero, proving that he wasn&#039;t Shakespeare&#039;s monster, but a good King. Have a scout round their Facebook page - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.facebook.com/pages/RICHARD-III-SOCIETY/114452911904874&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;[Link]&lt;/a&gt;. The society bankrolled this whole affair, and not least through Philippa&#039;s energies.

She felt the vibes as she walked through the car park, even before any excavation - &quot;And there, painted on the tarmac was a letter R!&quot; - &quot;It&#039;s like Richard III wanted to be found&quot; she said to UK&#039;s Daily Mail - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2272848/Richard-III-Woman-feels-chill-Leicester-car-park-human-remains-found.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;[Link]&lt;/a&gt; - &quot;I absolutely knew I was walking on his grave&quot;.

She was so certain of this that she insisted, against the protests of the embarrassed archaeologists that it was somewhat premature, given that no scientific tests had been performed, that the cardboard box containing the excavated remains be draped in his royal colors, before it was whisked off to the local CT scanner in a somewhat modest Vauxhall Astra.

Several times she broke down in tears, so moved was she by the presence of ... well, Royalty, I suppose.

There you have it - another familiar aspect of personal connection - fascinations with fame, celebrity and royalty, especially when there&#039;s the twist of this being a decent royal (and handsome too, according to the facial reconstruction) misjudged and unfairly maligned by the media, albeit that being Shakespeare.

PS Paddy Power the Bookmakers are offering odds of 4/1 that Philippa Langley will front a new Channel 4 archaeology series, after the scrapping of &quot;Time Team&quot;, the world&#039;s most popular TV archaeology program.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s why it matters &#8211; 2</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not underestimate the scope of the &#8220;haunting&#8221; past!</p>
<p>Channel 4 in the UK got it right last night in their documentary called &#8220;The King in the Car Park&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://www.channel4.com/programmes/richard-iii-the-king-in-the-car-park/4od" rel="nofollow">[Link]</a></p>
<p>Setting &#8211; a car park that used to be Greyfriars Church in Leicester UK.</p>
<p>Presenter &#8211; mop haired Simon Farnaby &#8211; “comedian actor” as he described himself, and best known, if at all, from <em>The Mighty Boosh</em> and the TV version of <em>Horrible Histories</em>. Comment on the body, its bent spine and bashed in head &#8211; &#8220;If that isn’t Richard III, that is one unlucky monk.”</p>
<p>The star was not an academic or historian, archaeologist or Church official, but Philippa Langley of the <em>Richard III Society</em> &#8211; devoted, quite literally, to putting the record straight about her hero, proving that he wasn&#8217;t Shakespeare&#8217;s monster, but a good King. Have a scout round their Facebook page &#8211; <a href="https://www.facebook.com/pages/RICHARD-III-SOCIETY/114452911904874" rel="nofollow">[Link]</a>. The society bankrolled this whole affair, and not least through Philippa&#8217;s energies.</p>
<p>She felt the vibes as she walked through the car park, even before any excavation &#8211; &#8220;And there, painted on the tarmac was a letter R!&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;It&#8217;s like Richard III wanted to be found&#8221; she said to UK&#8217;s Daily Mail &#8211; <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2272848/Richard-III-Woman-feels-chill-Leicester-car-park-human-remains-found.html" rel="nofollow">[Link]</a> &#8211; &#8220;I absolutely knew I was walking on his grave&#8221;.</p>
<p>She was so certain of this that she insisted, against the protests of the embarrassed archaeologists that it was somewhat premature, given that no scientific tests had been performed, that the cardboard box containing the excavated remains be draped in his royal colors, before it was whisked off to the local CT scanner in a somewhat modest Vauxhall Astra.</p>
<p>Several times she broke down in tears, so moved was she by the presence of &#8230; well, Royalty, I suppose.</p>
<p>There you have it &#8211; another familiar aspect of personal connection &#8211; fascinations with fame, celebrity and royalty, especially when there&#8217;s the twist of this being a decent royal (and handsome too, according to the facial reconstruction) misjudged and unfairly maligned by the media, albeit that being Shakespeare.</p>
<p>PS Paddy Power the Bookmakers are offering odds of 4/1 that Philippa Langley will front a new Channel 4 archaeology series, after the scrapping of &#8220;Time Team&#8221;, the world&#8217;s most popular TV archaeology program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Richard III found? &#8211; why it matters by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mshanks.com/2013/02/04/richard-iii-found-why-it-matters/#comment-5139</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mshanks.com/?p=4955#comment-5139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The importance of the face - lots of pictures of the skull, mentions of setting up a project to attempt facial reconstruction;

The religious respect accorded the remains at the press conference;

The competing claims over where the remains will be reburied (Leicester, Westminster Abbey in London, York?);

all point to the primacy of this emotive and personal link with the past.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The importance of the face &#8211; lots of pictures of the skull, mentions of setting up a project to attempt facial reconstruction;</p>
<p>The religious respect accorded the remains at the press conference;</p>
<p>The competing claims over where the remains will be reburied (Leicester, Westminster Abbey in London, York?);</p>
<p>all point to the primacy of this emotive and personal link with the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on political engagement, contemporary art, archaeology by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mshanks.com/2013/01/04/political-engagement-contemporary-art-archaeology/#comment-5117</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 03:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mshanks.com/?p=4856#comment-5117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More on archaeological sensibilities in contemporary art -

Contemporary Art between Time and History - Musée d&#039;art contemporain de Montréal - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.e-flux.com/announcements/contemporary-art-between-time-and-history/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;[Link]&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More on archaeological sensibilities in contemporary art -</p>
<p>Contemporary Art between Time and History &#8211; Musée d&#8217;art contemporain de Montréal &#8211; <a href="http://www.e-flux.com/announcements/contemporary-art-between-time-and-history/" rel="nofollow">[Link]</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on the archaeological uncanny by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mshanks.com/2012/12/14/the-archaeological-uncanny/#comment-4448</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mshanks.com/?p=4836#comment-4448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This connection with homeland and territory through the archaeological is very pertinent, Johan.

On very strange homes indeed - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mshanks.com/2004/12/05/everyday-horror-repressive-normality-and-the-archaeological-imagination/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.mshanks.com/2004/12/05/everyday-horror-repressive-normality-and-the-archaeological-imagination/&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This connection with homeland and territory through the archaeological is very pertinent, Johan.</p>
<p>On very strange homes indeed &#8211; <a href="http://www.mshanks.com/2004/12/05/everyday-horror-repressive-normality-and-the-archaeological-imagination/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mshanks.com/2004/12/05/everyday-horror-repressive-normality-and-the-archaeological-imagination/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on the archaeological uncanny by Johan Normark</title>
		<link>http://www.mshanks.com/2012/12/14/the-archaeological-uncanny/#comment-4446</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan Normark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mshanks.com/?p=4836#comment-4446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I while ago I wrote  about some other uncanny territories:

http://haecceities.wordpress.com/2011/04/19/the-uncanny-territory-of-the-home/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I while ago I wrote  about some other uncanny territories:</p>
<p><a href="http://haecceities.wordpress.com/2011/04/19/the-uncanny-territory-of-the-home/" rel="nofollow">http://haecceities.wordpress.com/2011/04/19/the-uncanny-territory-of-the-home/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on at Metamedia by Connie Svabo</title>
		<link>http://www.mshanks.com/2012/12/12/at-metamedia/#comment-4445</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie Svabo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mshanks.com/?p=4829#comment-4445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice - I&#039;ve been trying to comment on this by posting a thumbs up icon, but I can&#039;t seem to insert an image; instead here&#039;s a link to a handful with a smile...
 
https://www.google.dk/search?q=like&amp;hl=da&amp;tbo=d&amp;source=lnms&amp;tbm=isch&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=t5HLUOeABob0sgbkhoD4CA&amp;ved=0CAoQ_AUoAA&amp;biw=2087&amp;bih=1027]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice &#8211; I&#8217;ve been trying to comment on this by posting a thumbs up icon, but I can&#8217;t seem to insert an image; instead here&#8217;s a link to a handful with a smile&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.google.dk/search?q=like&#038;hl=da&#038;tbo=d&#038;source=lnms&#038;tbm=isch&#038;sa=X&#038;ei=t5HLUOeABob0sgbkhoD4CA&#038;ved=0CAoQ_AUoAA&#038;biw=2087&#038;bih=1027" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.dk/search?q=like&#038;hl=da&#038;tbo=d&#038;source=lnms&#038;tbm=isch&#038;sa=X&#038;ei=t5HLUOeABob0sgbkhoD4CA&#038;ved=0CAoQ_AUoAA&#038;biw=2087&#038;bih=1027</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
